March 2021
Total Posts = 0
February 2021
Total Posts = 0
January 2021
Total Posts = 0
December 2020
Total Posts = 0
November 2020
Total Posts = 0
October 2020
Total Posts = 0
September 2020
Total Posts = 0
August 2020
Total Posts = 0
July 2020
Total Posts = 0
June 2020
Total Posts = 0
May 2020
Total Posts = 0
April 2020
Total Posts = 0
March 2020
Total Posts = 3
Activity = 3 Posts against 3 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Spam Messaging (3),
Maximum Posts = 3 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Alto in this month
February 2020
Total Posts = 4
Activity = 4 Posts against 4 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Spam Messaging (4),
Maximum Posts = 4 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Dana in this month
January 2020
Total Posts = 1
Activity = 1 Posts against 1 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Marketing Lies (1),
Maximum Posts = 1 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Robert Warden CEO of Yobitex in this month
December 2019
Total Posts = 0
November 2019
Total Posts = 0
October 2019
Total Posts = 0
September 2019
Total Posts = 0
August 2019
Total Posts = 0
July 2019
Total Posts = 0
June 2019
Total Posts = 0
May 2019
Total Posts = 1
Activity = 1 Posts against 1 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (1),
Maximum Posts = 1 by adeelmir in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against BEST BUY CO INC RICHARDS DAVID MATTHEW in this month
April 2019
Total Posts = 0
March 2019
Total Posts = 1
Activity = 1 Posts against 1 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (1),
Maximum Posts = 1 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Dr Khan Raza in this month
February 2019
Total Posts = 0
January 2019
Total Posts = 0
December 2018
Total Posts = 0
November 2018
Total Posts = 0
October 2018
Total Posts = 0
September 2018
Total Posts = 5
Activity = 5 Posts against 5 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (2),
Spam Messaging (3),
Maximum Posts = 4 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Engr Abelardo Fernandez in this month
August 2018
Total Posts = 1
Activity = 1 Posts against 1 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (1),
Maximum Posts = 1 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Nice Elinushoka in this month
July 2018
Total Posts = 0
June 2018
Total Posts = 10
Activity = 10 Posts against 10 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Blackmailing Tactics (2),
Financial Losses (2),
Fraudulent Representation (2),
Ignorance (1),
Lack of Due Diligence (1),
Marketing Lies (1),
Spam Messaging (1),
Maximum Posts = 10 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Abbas Makkah in this month
May 2018
Total Posts = 12
Activity = 12 Posts against 12 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Breach of Contract (3),
Financial Losses (1),
Fraudulent Representation (1),
Hurt Emotionally (1),
Identity Theft (1),
Illegal Acts (2),
Indifference (1),
Lack of Due Diligence (1),
Spam Messaging (1),
Maximum Posts = 11 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Apple in this month
April 2018
Total Posts = 1
Activity = 1 Posts against 1 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Indifference (1),
Maximum Posts = 1 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Shaheen Air International in this month
March 2018
Total Posts = 1
Activity = 1 Posts against 1 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Indifference (1),
Maximum Posts = 1 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Samsung in this month
February 2018
Total Posts = 1
Activity = 1 Posts against 1 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Ignorance (1),
Maximum Posts = 1 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Arab Open University in this month
January 2018
Total Posts = 0
December 2017
Total Posts = 1
Activity = 1 Posts against 1 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Illegal Acts (1),
Maximum Posts = 1 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Ian Christopher McMullen in this month
November 2017
Total Posts = 0
October 2017
Total Posts = 20
Activity = 20 Posts against 20 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Blackmailing Tactics (1),
Breach of Contract (1),
Financial Losses (2),
Fraudulent Representation (3),
Illegal Acts (3),
Marketing Lies (1),
Misrepresentation (2),
Spam Messaging (7),
Maximum Posts = 8 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Florin Pavelescu in this month
September 2017
Total Posts = 4
Activity = 4 Posts against 4 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Breach of Contract (1),
Financial Losses (1),
Marketing Lies (1),
Misrepresentation (1),
Maximum Posts = 2 by LittleWhistle in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Aliexpress in this month
August 2017
Total Posts = 10
Activity = 10 Posts against 10 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Breach of Contract (1),
Financial Losses (1),
Hacked Systems (1),
Harassment (2),
Hurt Emotionally (1),
Lack of Due Diligence (1),
Spam Messaging (3),
Maximum Posts = 9 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Ad Financeira in this month
July 2017
Total Posts = 9
Activity = 9 Posts against 9 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Financial Losses (1),
Fraudulent Representation (2),
Harassment (1),
Illegal Acts (1),
Lack of Due Diligence (1),
Marketing Lies (2),
Spam Messaging (1),
Maximum Posts = 4 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against DHL in this month
June 2017
Total Posts = 15
Activity = 15 Posts against 15 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Blackmailing Tactics (2),
Breach of Contract (1),
Financial Losses (2),
Fraudulent Representation (1),
Hacked Systems (2),
Hurt Emotionally (1),
Ignorance (1),
Illegal Acts (1),
Lack of Due Diligence (1),
Spam Messaging (3),
Maximum Posts = 15 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Aleksandar Vucic in this month
May 2017
Total Posts = 76
Activity = 76 Posts against 73 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Blackmailing Tactics (2),
Breach of Contract (4),
Financial Losses (13),
Fraudulent Representation (12),
Hacked Systems (2),
Harassment (4),
Hurt Emotionally (4),
Hurt Physically (1),
Ignorance (3),
Illegal Acts (5),
Indifference (5),
Lack of Due Diligence (7),
Marketing Lies (8),
Misrepresentation (2),
Spam Messaging (4),
Maximum Posts = 38 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 4 against Paypal in this month
April 2017
Total Posts = 0
March 2017
Total Posts = 3
Activity = 3 Posts against 3 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Breach of Contract (1),
Fraudulent Representation (2),
Maximum Posts = 3 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Looks like Apple and PayPal in this month
February 2017
Total Posts = 8
Activity = 8 Posts against 8 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (3),
Illegal Acts (1),
Spam Messaging (2),
Unsolicited goods (2),
Maximum Posts = 7 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Automattic in this month
January 2017
Total Posts = 6
Activity = 6 Posts against 6 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (2),
Spam Messaging (2),
Unsolicited goods (2),
Maximum Posts = 5 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Amazon or Not Who knows in this month
December 2016
Total Posts = 3
Activity = 3 Posts against 3 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (3),
Maximum Posts = 2 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Neil Trotter in this month
November 2016
Total Posts = 4
Activity = 4 Posts against 4 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Financial Losses (1),
Hacked Systems (1),
Lack of Due Diligence (1),
Spam Messaging (1),
Maximum Posts = 4 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Bahria Town in this month
October 2016
Total Posts = 3
Activity = 3 Posts against 3 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Hacked Systems (1),
Spam Messaging (2),
Maximum Posts = 3 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Godaddy in this month
September 2016
Total Posts = 5
Activity = 5 Posts against 5 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Indifference (1),
Spam Messaging (4),
Maximum Posts = 5 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Barrister Jackson WestlawI
August 2016
Total Posts = 6
Activity = 6 Posts against 6 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Financial Losses (1),
Fraudulent Representation (1),
Ignorance (1),
Spam Messaging (3),
Maximum Posts = 6 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against ABIKE/DOLPHIN IMMIGRATION LAW CHAMBERS in this month
July 2016
Total Posts = 7
Activity = 7 Posts against 6 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Blackmailing Tactics (1),
Breach of Contract (1),
Ignorance (1),
Marketing Lies (4),
Maximum Posts = 7 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 2 against SAMBA BANK in this month
June 2016
Total Posts = 3
Activity = 3 Posts against 3 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Ignorance (1),
Indifference (1),
Lack of Due Diligence (1),
Maximum Posts = 3 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Egyptair in this month
May 2016
Total Posts = 7
Activity = 7 Posts against 7 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (1),
Hurt Physically (1),
Identity Theft (1),
Ignorance (1),
Indifference (3),
Maximum Posts = 6 by Anonymous in this month
Maximum Posts = 1 against Bahria Town in this month
April 2016
Total Posts = 10
Activity = 10 Posts against 8 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Breach of Contract (1),
Financial Losses (1),
Fraudulent Representation (1),
Illegal Acts (1),
Indifference (2),
Lack of Due Diligence (2),
Marketing Lies (2),
Maximum Posts = 2 by ms1sm in this month
Maximum Posts = 2 against Samba Bank in this month
March 2016
Total Posts = 0
February 2016
Total Posts = 0
January 2016
Total Posts = 0
2021
Total Posts = 0
2020
Total Posts = 8
Activity = 8 Posts against 8 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Marketing Lies (1),
Spam Messaging (7),
Maximum Posts = 8 by Anonymous in this year
Maximum Posts = 1 against Alto in this year
2019
Total Posts = 2
Activity = 2 Posts against 2 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Fraudulent Representation (2),
Maximum Posts = 1 by Anonymous in this year
Maximum Posts = 1 against BEST BUY CO INC RICHARDS DAVID MATTHEW in this year
2018
Total Posts = 31
Activity = 31 Posts against 29 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Blackmailing Tactics (2),
Breach of Contract (3),
Financial Losses (3),
Fraudulent Representation (6),
Hurt Emotionally (1),
Identity Theft (1),
Ignorance (2),
Illegal Acts (2),
Indifference (3),
Lack of Due Diligence (2),
Marketing Lies (1),
Spam Messaging (5),
Maximum Posts = 29 by Anonymous in this year
Maximum Posts = 2 against GODADDY in this year
2017
Total Posts = 152
Activity = 152 Posts against 147 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Blackmailing Tactics (5),
Breach of Contract (9),
Financial Losses (20),
Fraudulent Representation (25),
Hacked Systems (5),
Harassment (7),
Hurt Emotionally (6),
Hurt Physically (1),
Ignorance (4),
Illegal Acts (12),
Indifference (5),
Lack of Due Diligence (10),
Marketing Lies (12),
Misrepresentation (5),
Spam Messaging (22),
Unsolicited goods (4),
Maximum Posts = 90 by Anonymous in this year
Maximum Posts = 5 against Paypal in this year
2016
Total Posts = 48
Activity = 48 Posts against 36 Entities/ Organisations
Concerns = Blackmailing Tactics (1),
Breach of Contract (2),
Financial Losses (3),
Fraudulent Representation (6),
Hacked Systems (2),
Hurt Physically (1),
Identity Theft (1),
Ignorance (4),
Illegal Acts (1),
Indifference (7),
Lack of Due Diligence (4),
Marketing Lies (6),
Spam Messaging (10),
Maximum Posts = 37 by Anonymous in this year
Maximum Posts = 4 against Samba Bank in this year

In 2016 : 15 Members
blamed 11 Entities/ Organisations
for Indifference
In 2017 : 17 Members
blamed 17 Entities/ Organisations
for Indifference
In 2018 : 4 Members
blamed 4 Entities/ Organisations
for Indifference

In 2016 : 9 Members
blamed 9 Entities/ Organisations
for Illegal Acts
In 2017 : 39 Members
blamed 39 Entities/ Organisations
for Illegal Acts
In 2018 : 6 Members
blamed 6 Entities/ Organisations
for Illegal Acts
In 2019 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Illegal Acts
In 2020 : 4 Members
blamed 4 Entities/ Organisations
for Illegal Acts

In 2016 : 13 Members
blamed 10 Entities/ Organisations
for Lack of Due Diligence
In 2017 : 22 Members
blamed 22 Entities/ Organisations
for Lack of Due Diligence
In 2018 : 12 Members
blamed 11 Entities/ Organisations
for Lack of Due Diligence

In 2016 : 17 Members
blamed 15 Entities/ Organisations
for Marketing Lies
In 2017 : 40 Members
blamed 38 Entities/ Organisations
for Marketing Lies
In 2018 : 6 Members
blamed 6 Entities/ Organisations
for Marketing Lies
In 2020 : 2 Members
blamed 2 Entities/ Organisations
for Marketing Lies

In 2016 : 10 Members
blamed 9 Entities/ Organisations
for Financial Losses
In 2017 : 43 Members
blamed 40 Entities/ Organisations
for Financial Losses
In 2018 : 8 Members
blamed 8 Entities/ Organisations
for Financial Losses

In 2016 : 20 Members
blamed 20 Entities/ Organisations
for Fraudulent Representation
In 2017 : 55 Members
blamed 54 Entities/ Organisations
for Fraudulent Representation
In 2018 : 9 Members
blamed 9 Entities/ Organisations
for Fraudulent Representation
In 2019 : 2 Members
blamed 2 Entities/ Organisations
for Fraudulent Representation
In 2020 : 2 Members
blamed 2 Entities/ Organisations
for Fraudulent Representation

In 2016 : 4 Members
blamed 4 Entities/ Organisations
for Breach of Contract
In 2017 : 15 Members
blamed 15 Entities/ Organisations
for Breach of Contract
In 2018 : 7 Members
blamed 7 Entities/ Organisations
for Breach of Contract

In 2016 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Hurt Physically
In 2017 : 2 Members
blamed 2 Entities/ Organisations
for Hurt Physically
In 2018 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Hurt Physically

In 2016 : 8 Members
blamed 6 Entities/ Organisations
for Ignorance
In 2017 : 13 Members
blamed 13 Entities/ Organisations
for Ignorance
In 2018 : 8 Members
blamed 8 Entities/ Organisations
for Ignorance

In 2016 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Identity Theft
In 2017 : 6 Members
blamed 6 Entities/ Organisations
for Identity Theft
In 2018 : 3 Members
blamed 3 Entities/ Organisations
for Identity Theft
In 2020 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Identity Theft

In 2016 : 2 Members
blamed 2 Entities/ Organisations
for Blackmailing Tactics
In 2017 : 8 Members
blamed 8 Entities/ Organisations
for Blackmailing Tactics
In 2018 : 2 Members
blamed 2 Entities/ Organisations
for Blackmailing Tactics

In 2016 : 15 Members
blamed 14 Entities/ Organisations
for Spam Messaging
In 2017 : 54 Members
blamed 54 Entities/ Organisations
for Spam Messaging
In 2018 : 14 Members
blamed 14 Entities/ Organisations
for Spam Messaging
In 2019 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Spam Messaging
In 2020 : 8 Members
blamed 8 Entities/ Organisations
for Spam Messaging

In 2016 : 4 Members
blamed 4 Entities/ Organisations
for Hacked Systems
In 2017 : 10 Members
blamed 10 Entities/ Organisations
for Hacked Systems
In 2018 : 2 Members
blamed 2 Entities/ Organisations
for Hacked Systems

In 2017 : 5 Members
blamed 5 Entities/ Organisations
for Unsolicited goods

In 2016 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Hurt Emotionally
In 2017 : 12 Members
blamed 12 Entities/ Organisations
for Hurt Emotionally
In 2018 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Hurt Emotionally

In 2016 : 10 Members
blamed 8 Entities/ Organisations
for Misrepresentation
In 2017 : 30 Members
blamed 30 Entities/ Organisations
for Misrepresentation
In 2018 : 5 Members
blamed 5 Entities/ Organisations
for Misrepresentation
In 2020 : 7 Members
blamed 7 Entities/ Organisations
for Misrepresentation

In 2016 : 1 Members
blamed 1 Entities/ Organisations
for Harassment
In 2017 : 17 Members
blamed 17 Entities/ Organisations
for Harassment
In 2018 : 2 Members
blamed 2 Entities/ Organisations
for Harassment
Agreed by 3
Anonymous vs PayPal
I browsed the PayPal website extensively to find a way to make contact with someone at Paypal in order to rectify this issue. NO email address is supplied to contact their help desk unless you're logged in. Which I couldn't do. A phone number is supplied which I was instructed to use to 'call as a guest'. The number doesn't work. There is NO WAY for me, an existing client, to log into the Paypal website, and NO WAY to contact anybody at PayPal in order to solve this issue. On the blogs, I could see that I'm not the only person with this type of problem.
The following is what PayPal claims on the landing page of their site: "We've got you covered. We can reimburse you if something’s not right.
Shop with peace of mind..." This, to me, is gross marketing lies of the service they offer - they clearly don't care about their clients. Period.
Agreed by 2
SOSHIM vs NADRA
Agreed by 2
Anonymous vs Hammond Pole Attorneys and FNB
Spoke with the branch manager and we made an arrangement.
Despite this, my account was still handed over to Hammond Pole Attorneys, who started calling me once a day.
I explained their mistake to them via telephone and got an email address to which I was asked to send a written explanation.
The email address was incorrect and the email bounced. It took almost a year before they stopped contacting me, long after the issue was solved with FNB.
They say on their homepage they're serious about service. Serious about crap service yes.
Agreed by 2
Anonymous vs Paypal KE
When I contacted Paypal to inquire about the limiting of my account, I was informed that there are a number of reasons as to why the account could have been limited, but the common reason is suspicion of fraud or security matters. I had already verified the account with Paypal and all details were up to date.
However, I could not withdraw money, shop online, edit personal information, send money, cancel or close the account.
On launching complaints to Paypal, I kept on receiving the automated emails and informed that I can only access the money after 180 days.
Agreed by 2
Anonymous vs Co parenting South Africa
Agreed by 2
Anonymous vs GnB English Academy
I worked as an English teacher to full classes of often over-worked and tired school children. This was not the issue - I'm an experienced ESL teacher with many years' teaching under my belt, yet I had to take teaching instruction from a CEO who could barely understand or speak English. He was also a racist with loose business ethics - each month I had to beg for my salary. I fell ill with pneumonia in the second last month of work and spent three days in bed, for which I was severely 'penalised' - the CEO paid only half my salary and refused to pay my plane ticket back home. This is illegal in S.Korea, but it doesn't bother most private hagwon owners.
Agreed by 1
sohelmugal vs Saudi Airlines
Agreed by 1
Foswarak vs Graiet
Agreed by 1
sohi vs Bank of Montreal
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Star Alliance
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Phone Snatcher
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs United Nations
I believe most HR people are lazy. They create internet based artificially intelligent programs where candidates have to spend hours inserting data about their lives and education and experiences, so that these programs can filter a few out of thousands of CVs based on the keywords devised by the HR people. Most HR people being not aware of the educational terminology, use the wrong keywords to attract or filter CVs.
United Nations is meant to help people with "High speed Internets" and "no internet" alike and such methods are discriminatory.
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Internic.ca
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Flynas
But if these seats are empty; the air stewards and stewardesses would let anybody occupy them after the flight takes off.
While I have nothing against people who occupy empty seats I think the staff needs to be mindful of people like me feel cheated for having paid more than others for the same level of service.
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Microsoft
1. Who has the time and money and energy to create intricate viruses, development of which requires high end resources in various countries; and which the largest gurus of the tech industry can not overcome or troubleshoot.
2. Why windows hides the file extensions on the email attachments, so that people could not differentiate between an attached zip file or an exe file or a pdf file.
3. Why operating systems do not force the users to backup their data.
4. Does it mean that selling security is the new business and thus the demand has to be created by disturbing the security first in the cyber world, as its happening in the real world.
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Bahria Town
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Peer Mähnert
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Dr Khan Raza
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Pyramid e-Services
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Dr Soliman Fakeeh Hospital
My wife wanted to see a gynecologist. It took us a dozen attempts to reach the page where we could select a doctor. Turns out none of the doctors shown in the boastful list were available. Booking an appointment either results in "no appointments available" message, or a system crash. How can no appointments be available unless the doctors don't exist. Then the available appointments with some doctors are a month away. In a conservative society like Saudi Arabia, more than half of the gynecologists are male doctors.
We started looking for other options on doctoruna.com/en and booked an appointment via phone at lower scale Jeddah National Hospital at Macarona Street, and found it very organised and welcoming. Of course we paid from our own pocket, but the payments were less than half of what we would have paid at DSFH. (less)
Agreed by 1
Mila vs Pizzahut
The next day I called the franchise headquarters to lodge a complaint. We were given vouchers for free meals at a Pizza Hut of our choice.
Agreed by 1
Mila vs spammers
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs CIty of Cape Town
It was impossible for me to make the payment that day and was almost fined as a consequence.
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Canadian Pharmacy
2. No opt-out or removal method was provided
3. This is criminal spam, that can send the spammer to jail and pay a penalty to federal Trade Commission
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Impersonating PayPal
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Saher
While Saher system has played a major role in controlling the recklessness of drivers on Saudi Roads, and saving numerous lives, I find it necessary to point out the difference between reformative control and entrapping. In many countries, Police and Governments have been accused of "Big Brother tactics" in over-monitoring of public roads, and of "revenue raising" in applying cameras in deceptive ways to increase government revenue rather than improve road safety. I have the following examples and suggestions;
1. Installing a speed detection camera right after an entry lane is not a good idea. Drivers need to accelerate in the entry lane to meet the speed of traffic on the highway so that they do not disturb the highway traffic and do not force other drivers to perform sudden and dangerous lane changes. In the same way if someone is not merging at the required speed, the highway traffic has to speed up or slow down to accommodate the new entrant. All these maneuvers at the merging point require increasing speeds to avoid accidents for a few seconds sometimes. Installing as camera right at the the merging point seems like entrapping.
2. There are areas where the speed limits are posted to be increasing from a slower to faster speed. Installing a camera in such areas where drivers are about to be allowed to increase their speeds seems like entrapping or unfair. It is understandable to install cameras where drivers are required to reduce speeds but not where they are required to increase speeds.
3. Installing speed cameras at intersections is inappropriate. Pictures from the San Diego red light camera systems were ruled inadmissible as court evidence in September 2001. The judge said that the "total lack of oversight" and "method of compensation" made evidence from the cameras "so untrustworthy and unreliable that it should not be admitted". Drivers need to speed up if they are caught in the middle of the intersection due to traffic blocks or when they are unable to dead stop due green turning to amber in the middle of intersection.
4. Cameras have tolerances in one direction only. Normally 5% above the posted speed is not penalized and caters to probable mistakes in accuracy. Cameras do not penalize drivers going slower by 10% or even 50% than the posted speed. This sometimes causes other drivers to speed up and pass the trouble maker.
Agreed by 1
fcadmin vs DR ANTHONY EMMANUEL
It seems that some people have received similar emails for an "advance fee fraud" from dr.anthony_emmanuel@yahoo.fr and emmanuelanthony012@terra.com.pe
Originating IP address : 154.66.162.179 is from Burkina Faso
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Amazon
The screenshot attached shows that the email is coming from Amazon and the proposed link (from the text of fake order no 192-773-7646) in the body of the email will take you to some other website to complete its heinous fraud.
I tried to find if Dean Clark was a writer. I found a few University professors by this name. There have been a few more prominent Dean Clarks.
1. Dean Clark was the voice of Berlioz in the Cartoon Movie "AristoCats" from 1970.
2. Dean Clark is a former ice hockey defenceman and head coach of the Prince George Cougars. Clark is also the former head coach of the Kamloops Blazers of the Western Hockey League.
3. Dean Clark (born 31 March 1980) is a retired footballer. He was originally a professional who made a handful of appearances for Brentford and then went on to play for a variety of teams local to north and west London, including making over one hundred appearances for Northwood.
4. Dean Clark (born 6 January 1968) is a New Zealand rugby league coach and former footballer who represented his country between 1989 and 1992.
So even though the email is not intended to be sent to me by amazon.com, I believe Amazon.com owes me a duty of care to secure its IT assets so that people do not use their domain names to send fraudster emails.
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Interac
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Microsoft
They re-sent my software and explained what happened with this:"We have researched this issue internally and have found this to NOT be a VIPER related issue. We contacted Microsoft directly and Microsoft has confirmed KB4074588 has known issues where some USB devices stop working. We recommend contacting Microsoft directly for any issues related to your USB Keyboard and Mouse no longer working. Their contact information can be found at ** or by calling 1-800-642-7676".
After trying to get answers and compensation over the phone, I had to drive to the Microsoft store and talk to a manager. He said they were aware of the issue that was happening "on older PC's". I showed him proof of my repair bills, and the receipts that showed my PC was only 9 months old. I am a senior living on Social Security with limited income and thought they might at least pay me out of pocket expenses. The manager came back with $100 in Microsoft gift certificates and said he would escalate my issue to corporate but could promise nothing. After getting home, I looked at what was available at the MS store. Nothing there was of interest to me. Follow-up calls just led to more frustration. I was given lip service and promises of return calls that never came. As big as this company is, you would think they could afford to at least cover the damages they caused.
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Samsung
Recently, I have had 3 service calls for the ice maker. The ice maker freezes solid and won't dispense ice. Then, I need to move all my refrigerated food to a cooler and my frozen food to the outside freezer; turn off the entire unit for 2 days, with both doors propped open; and put an air circulator/warmer inside, just so the repairman can pry the completely frozen icemaker out without cracking the wall of the refrigerator. On the last service call, he replaced the entire ice maker for about $550.00. My total out of pocket for repairs and service is about $850.00. I fully expect that amount to grow. Now, it sort of works, but makes very little ice, (which will not be enough with summer coming).
I cannot get cubed ice, just crushed ice; there is water dripping down the front of the refrigerator and it is a constant source of aggravation. Samsung wasn't sympathetic or helpful when I talked with them, and they suggested that I should have purchased their 5-year Samsung Service Agreement for $1750.00 when I had a chance. Really? They were supposed to call me back (within 24 hours) 10 months ago, and I'm still waiting. Complete waste of time, money, effort, energy and resources. "Do not ever buy a Samsung refrigerator because they are expensive junk", was the advice of my repair person, who has owned an appliance repair business for many years. I could have saved myself lots of frustration, and money, if I had done my research.
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs SAMBA BANK
I called the number I was given and I was taken into the system when I entered my ATM card number. Instead of verifying the card, the auto attendant said, I have to call another number, which was the same number I had called. I have been trying for the last 2 days and No one in the bank has noticed that there system is going in circles...
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs UPWORK
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs Zynking
I have received an email from the zynking server saying that they will be providing me a tax refund from Canadian Government.
Agreed by 1
Anonymous vs GoDaddy